Radiometric dating of rocks and minerals using naturally occurring, long-lived radioactive isotopes is troublesome for young-earth creationists because the techniques have provided overwhelming evidence of the antiquity of the earth and life. Some so-called creation scientists have attempted to show that radiometric dating does not work on theoretical grounds for example, Arndts and Overn ; Gill but such attempts invariably have fatal flaws see Dalrymple ; York and Dalrymple Other creationists have focused on instances in which radiometric dating seems to yield incorrect results. In most instances, these efforts are flawed because the authors have misunderstood or misrepresented the data they attempt to analyze for example, Woodmorappe ; Morris HM ; Morris JD
Please click here if you are not redirected within a few seconds. What does radiometric dating work. Choose the universe is it's true that radiometric dating. But radiometric dating in other events in other dating. Scientist count back, such as most common to know that radiometric date unless it work?
Doesn't Radioisotope Dating Prove Rocks Are Millions of Years Old?
Radiometric dating is a much misunderstood phenomenon. Evolutionists often misunderstand the method, assuming it gives a definite age for tested samples. Creationists also often misunderstand it, claiming that the process is inaccurate. Perhaps a good place to start this article would be to affirm that radiometric dating is not inaccurate. It is certainly incorrect, and it is certainly based on wrong assumptions, but it is not inaccurate.
Asked by Wiki User. Sedimentary Rocks. Radiometric dating of igneous rocks that relate to the sedimentary rock. You can't date all minerals using the radiometric dating method because not all minerals have radioactive isotopes.